Pynchon vs. Pynchon/bashing reviewers

[robinlandseadel at comcast.net]

"Nuanced" or not, we still all got functional BS detectors, and it's real easy hearing knives being sharpened in the background, bets being settled, folks acting like they are above whatever text has been forced on them by the powers that be.  Fact is, the meaningful criticism will come from circles such as ours, people already aware of the potential complexities and pitfalls of Pynchon's fictions.
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: pynchonoid <pynchonoid at yahoo.com>
> The reviewers who base a review on a less than serious
> reading, or not having finished the book, deserve to
> be criticized negatively for offering overarching
> conclusions about the book or what it says about
> Pynchon's carer. 
> 
> Editors who assign this review to a known
> Pynchon-hater  are just stirring up shit, and those
> reviews aren't to be taken seriously. 
> 
> Serious reviews will be taken seriously here. They
> always have been.
> 
> "We" include fans and Pynchon scholars who write about
> Pynchon's work in a nuanced way.  I don't think it's
> quite accurate to call it a "fan list".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >http://pynchonoid.org
> >>"everything connects"
> 
> 
>  
> ________________________________________________________________________________
> ____
> Sponsored Link
> 
> Rates near 39yr lows. $420,000 Loan for $1399/mo. 
> Calcuate new payment. www.LowerMyBills.com/lre
>