Pynchon vs. Pynchon/bashing reviewers

[MalignD at aol.com]

<< The notion that Pynchon-l is all or only about uncritical Pynchon worship 
is as nonsensical as the idea that a reviewer who doesn't read the book should 
get a pass if she pisses on the book.  >>

Michiko Kakutani is a tasteless ass.  But it is typical of you to use her as 
a the umbrella under which to hide every other disagreeing review.

And of course the Pynchon list isn't wholly uncritical of Pynchon.  YOU are 
and you can't abide those who feel diffferently.