Hard covers and lack thereof
Paul Mackin
paul.mackin at verizon.net
Fri Sep 8 09:10:08 CDT 2006
On Sep 8, 2006, at 8:51 AM, David Morris wrote:
> I'm of two minds. Hard covers are for keeps. But that means you have
> to take care of them. I think of paperbacks as disposable, even
> though I never throw them out. But I don't have to worry about
> abusing them. They usually end up being taped together on the outside
> spine...
I almost never buy paperbound books, like to get things when they are
brand new, and in the U.S. new eschews paper. More's the pity.
When GR broke the rule I thought great, but apparently economics went
against the practice. You can't charge $25 (present dollars) for a
paperback. Traditional thinking but let's face it we live in a
throwaway world.
>
> On 9/8/06, Ya Sam <takoitov at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Paperbacks tend to disintegrate. Anyway, there is a limit to a the
>> volume of paperback library in one's backpack. And I HATE the
>> creases that appear on the spine after a first reading. And there
>> is a good chance of ending up with two halves of one book upon a
>> second reading.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list