does AtD solid rock?

[Mark Kohut]

Keith,
   
  I'll vote B.......
   
  And I'll bring up another Icelandic refraction with which to compare the two.
   
  (Admittedly, I haven't yet finished my remedial reading of GR....but I want to ask ALL)
   
  isn't TRP trying to say, SHOW, encompass much more in AtD than (even in) GR?    
   
  So many themes upon themes, upon insights, notions and possiblities?  don't we think he wants GR to be--in some way--encompassed---by AtD? (that ending, say?)
  
Whether he succeeds at this........is (one of) the questions.
   
  MK
Keith <keithsz at mac.com> wrote:
  On Jul 10, 2007, at 7:38 AM, Dave Monroe wrote:

It's like complaining that Jesus ain't no God.
-----------------------------------------------

This line of thought could bring some clarity to the various 
viewpoints re: the GR/AtD relationship.

Is AtD

(a) homoousian (of same substance and essence)
(b) homoiousian (of similar, but not identical substance/essence)
(c) homoian (similar but distinctly inferior)
or
(d) heteroousian (different substance/essence)

vis-à-vis GR?






       
---------------------------------
Building a website is a piece of cake. 
Yahoo! Small Business gives you all the tools to get online.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20070711/1e91f79b/attachment-0001.html>