It's about time to stop taking the subway. . . .
Mark Kohut
markekohut at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 2 12:58:23 CDT 2007
yes...
Look up the meanings of "pull" re building........One has to "pull" a building permit, for example, to START building......
The building was evacuated because it LOOKED F'IN' DANGEROUS.......they pulled everyone from it.........
If we haven't learned of 'other' meanings to simple words by reading OBA, then
what have we learned?
This whole 9/11 conspiracy 'discussion' dispirits me, except for those who are
agin it..................................
David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
No, I think Cometman has it right. Silverstein spoke of "pulling the
building" in order to avoid any further loss of life, meaning the fire
crew. And, really, how could anyone possibly think he would admit to
having pulled off a controlled demolition in the middle of a TV
interview?
BTW, as I said earlier, cutting steel columns and loading them w/
explosives for a controlled demolition couldn't be pulled off in
secret in the middle of an occupied office building. Those columns
aren't hiding in closets. They're in the middle of offices. And who
ever saw a building inspector of fife inspector walking around with
acetylene torches ans welder's helmets? This "controlled demolition"
theory just doesn't hold up under even a cursory inspection.
David Morris
On 11/2/07, robinlandseadel at comcast.net wrote:
> Me:
> This clip covers Silverstein 'pulling' building #7.
>
> Cometman:
> couldn't he have also meant, "pull the team from the building?"
>
> No. It's unambiguous. Watch again:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9b4D-aO3zY
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20071102/0d0356a4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list