Change in Plans? - Dimm

[kevin cummiskey]

Dear Dim: great idea, sorry I had detention today, hopefully you weren't waiting, but how 'bout tomarrow. Instead of a fight (im chicken) I was thinking maybe we could start our own circle-jerk (behind 7-11) out-side of PynCircleJerkSessions (PCJS) and then we could charge an entrance fee for any prospective loser's (there are plenty) who want in.

yor friend?

duhh


--- On Wed, 8/27/08, Tim Strzechowski <dedalus204 at comcast.net> wrote:

> From: Tim Strzechowski <dedalus204 at comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: Fw: Re: Monroe Doctrine states: Dim Strdghsfk;ghsdgfh
> To: kevincummiskey at yahoo.com, pynchon-l at waste.org
> Cc: "kevin cummiskey" <kevincummiskey at yahoo.com>
> Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 10:47 AM
> Oh, yeah?  After school, behind the 7-11, buster!
> 
> LMAO
> 
> 
> 
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: kevin cummiskey <kevincummiskey at yahoo.com>
> >  Hey Dim, For those readers (such as yourself) with
> less of imagination (and in 
> > need of explanation), you were ment to read the
> subject line and then follow 
> > through onto the open page, I understand it's
> somewhat abstract, go back to your 
> > vectors and colorul screen saver-pages dimwits.
> > 
> > 
> > --- On Wed, 8/27/08, Tim Strzechowski
> <dedalus204 at comcast.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Tim Strzechowski
> <dedalus204 at comcast.net>
> > > Subject: Re: Monroe Doctrine states:
> > > To: "Dave Monroe"
> <against.the.dave at gmail.com>
> > > Cc: pynchon-l at waste.org
> > > Date: Wednesday, August 27, 2008, 9:54 AM
> > > A basic knowledge of sentence construction helps,
> too ...
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >  -------------- Original message
> ----------------------
> > > From: "Dave Monroe"
> > > <against.the.dave at gmail.com>
> > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:39 AM, kevin
> cummiskey
> > > > <kevincummiskey at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > we will mettle due to inherent double
> digit IQ
> > > > 
> > > > I wasn't so wrong after all to recommend
> a good
> > > dictionary here ...
> > 
> > 
> >       
> >