AtDTDA: [38] p. 1085 They fly towards grace.
Mark Kohut
markekohut at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 15 06:37:38 CDT 2008
What great stuff, Robin. Thanks and more Thanx.
Pynchon exfoliates, meanings are layered, as we are always saying. But some meanings are more equal than others, to allude.
I see the ending most like this from my reading---with my goggles off:
TRP has given us, in AtD, a definition of Grace that is, yes, religious, but is distinctly contrasted with the Western Christian Protestant (Puritan) understanding of grace. TRP gave us (thru Lew B.) a new, more
Buddhist-influenced definition: an acceptance of things as they are.
I see TRP embedding this paradox in the ending: we have to accept "things as they are" to have any grace, those things including Death and the evils
of History. Here, in a book that ends in historical time after WW1, shortly after Fascism entered Time, but while peace reigned among the major Powers, but before the V-2s of GR and WW2 are launched (but the contamination of the air corridor fills AtD), is when the Chums and families 'fly into grace'.
Later,
Mark
--- On Wed, 8/13/08, robinlandseadel at comcast.net <robinlandseadel at comcast.net> wrote:
> From: robinlandseadel at comcast.net <robinlandseadel at comcast.net>
> Subject: AtDTDA: [38] p. 1085 They fly towards grace.
> To: "P-list" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2008, 1:12 PM
> The final sentence of Against the Day—"They fly
> towards
> Grace"—contains an unresolvable paradox or two.
>
> Grace has a number of meanings, though local context in the
>
> tale's final page nearly singles this line into a
> specific Christian
> meaning. This review from "The American Prospect"
> points to
> primary puritan meanings of "Grace":
>
> From his Puritan ancestors Pynchon learned that
> grace
> comes to some of us and not others according to
> God's
> inscrutable wishes. What we do does not affect
> our salvation.
> We who believe in a gospel of success cannot
> easily imagine
> a people convinced of its irrelevance. But
> suppose corruption
> had thoroughly rotted a society: a God
> indifferent to worldly
> opinion might grow in popularity. If officially
> virtuous people
> were really villains, maybe publicly despised
> people were
> really saints. If everything you heard was a lie,
> perhaps
> only God could winnow truth.
>
> Early in Against the Day Pynchon reminds us of
> this idea and
> expresses it graphically: "Many people
> believe that there is
> a mathematical correlation between sin, penance,
> and
> redemption. More sin, more penance, and so
> forth...
> [But t]here is no connection.... You are redeemed
> not through
> doing penance but because it happens. Or
> doesn't happen."
> The salvation story we might like -- we do good
> and we get
> rewarded -- implies a line whose equation we
> could plot. But
> the arbitrary Puritan God robs us of plottable
> lines. Grace
> comes when He pleases and at no predictable
> moment.
>
> http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=12356
>
> But the Buddhist concept of Grace seems to apply
> here as well, Karmic awareness that lets the light in.
>
> From:
> Buddhism and Christianity: Interpreting A New Testament
> Passage
>
> by Alfred Bloom Emeritus Professor of Religion University
> of Hawaii
>
> The principle of grace which permeates the New
> Testament
> was singled out as the singular focal point for
> Christian
> theology by the German reformer Martin Luther
> (1483-1546).
> Sola Fide, faith alone, was proclaimed as the
> witness to the
> acceptance and trust in God’s grace.
>
> However, 200 years before Luther, Shinran
> established the
> paradigm of true entrusting endowed through the
> gift of
> Amida Buddha’s compassion and wisdom as the
> paradigm
> for salvation in Pure Land Buddhism. Where
> Christianity
> taught that salvation is not by works but by
> faith and grace,
> described as God’s unmerited favor, Shinran
> taught that we
> cannot attain enlightenment through
> self-inspired, self-striving
> practices. Rather, we can attain salvation only
> through trust and
> reliance on Amida’s unconditional compassion
> expressed in
> his Primal Vow. Consequently, trust in God’s
> grace or trust
> (shinjin) in Amida’s unconditional compassion
> became
> watchwords in the respective traditions.
>
> Shin Buddhists can look upon the principle of
> grace in Christianity
> and Shin Buddhism as significant evidence for
> the universality
> of trust in human experience. Faith is the basis
> for living and
> meaning in everyday human existence. A measure
> of trust and
> faith is involved in every dimension of life,
> especially in human
> relations. Religious faith and symbolism opens
> our eyes to
> the fact that our everyday life rests on the gift
> of love and
> compassion shared by family, friendships and
> community.
>
> Nevertheless, this parable, so influential in
> Christianity, is
> essentially Buddhist in character. The sheep did
> not rebel
> against the master or shepherd. Rather, it
> wandered off
> from the flock and lost its way. It was, by
> implication, in
> error and ignorant, but not sinful which is
> viewed in the
> Bible as rebellion against God.
>
> http://www.shindharmanet.com/writings/b&c.htm
>
> . . . .or the abattoir. . . .
>
> Soon they will see the pressure-gauge begin to
> fall.
> They will feel the turn in the wind. They will
> put on
> smoked goggles for the glory of what is coming to
>
> part the sky. They fly toward grace
>
> If I plug "the glory of what is coming to part the
> sky" into Google,
> the very first thing to come up is an article on the
> "Second Coming",
> the Rapture. Of course, there's also a review of
> Against the Day as well:
>
> from: Thomas Pynchon and the myth of invisibility
> by Sophie Ratcliffe
>
> The Chums are the most important characters for
> Pynchon,
> for two reasons. First, they have ultimate faith
> in invisibility
> their own existence in the narrative depends on
> their state—
> of perceived, altruistic absence from the world.
> The second
> reason becomes evident in the closing pages of
> the novel,
> when the Inconvenience, “once a vehicle of
> sky-pilgrimage”,
> is transformed into its own destination. It is a
> place “where
> any wish that can be made is at least addressed,
> if not always
> granted” . . . .
>
> This sounds like classic Pynchon, but there is
> something newly
> visible. The cadences are so lulling that it
> would be easy to see
> this as, if not celebration, an endearing closing
> sentimentality.
> But on a closer look, the final scene has
> disturbing resonances,
> as if a crew of Boy’s Own suicide bombers were
> setting out on
> a self-effacing mission to destruct. Of all the
> attempted explosions
> in the book, this is the biggest. It is Thomas
> Pynchon’s attempt
> to explode the myth of invisibility. It speaks of
> now, as well as
> then.
>
> http://tls.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,25339-2477997,00.html
>
> Like Richard Strauss' "Also Sprach
> Zarathustra", Against the Day
> ends Bi-Tonally:
>
> One of the major compositional themes of the
> piece is the contrast
> between the keys of B major, representing
> humanity, and C major,
> representing the universe. Although B and C are
> adjacent notes,
> these keys are tonally dissimilar: B major uses
> five sharps, while
> C major has none.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Also_sprach_Zarathustra_(Richard_Strauss)
>
> Touched as I am by the sense of the story lines
> "singling up", I am
> also aware where exclusion of options ultimately leads.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list