One last time (and then I give up....)

[Ray Easton]

Robin Landseadel wrote:
> Again, the concern isn't how HTML looks in our e-mail programs, it's 
> how HTML sub-codes appear on the Waste.org archives, which appear to 
> be steam powered.
Not trying to beat a dead  horse, just trying to understand exactly what 
the problem is...  Is the problem that the codes are unconverted (stored 
as text) on/by Waste?   In that case, it would seem that pasting the 
text into an html-aware reader would recreate the original without 
junk.  Or is the problem that the codes ARE converted, into something 
that can no longer be read as anything but junk?

Ray