On Being Certain
robinlandseadel at comcast.net
robinlandseadel at comcast.net
Tue Mar 11 06:26:07 CDT 2008
Found this Salon article by Robert Burton---a modern dude, not the
Anatomy of Melancholy guy---the author of "On Being Certain:
Believing You Are Right Even When You're Not ":
http://www.amazon.com/Being-Certain-Believing-Right-Youre/dp/0312359209
. . . . concerning the sensation of being certain, of "knowing". I was
looking up conceptual connections at the root of Buddhism
when I stumbled into this article. Robert Burton's thoughts
lead to concepts out of Pynchon:
These sentences, this collection of poetically rambling and
seemingly unrelated impressions, has all lines singling up into place
after the inclusion of the "secret', unspoken word. Very Pynchonian:
To understand what I mean about the feeling of
knowing, read the following paragraph at normal
speed. Don't skim, give up halfway through or skip
to the explanation. Because this experience can't
be duplicated once you know the explanation,
take a moment to ask yourself how you feel about
the paragraph. After reading the clarifying word,
reread the paragraph. As you do, pay close attention
to the shifts in your mental state and your feeling
about the paragraph:
A newspaper is better than a magazine. A seashore is
a better place than the street. At first it is better to run
than to walk. You may have to try several times. It
takes some skill but it is easy to learn. Even young
children can enjoy it. Once successful, complications
are minimal. Birds seldom get too close. Rain, however,
soaks in very fast. Too many people doing the same
thing can also cause problems. One needs lots of
room. If there are no complications it can be very
peaceful. A rock will serve as an anchor. If things break
loose from it, however, you will not get a second chance.
Is this paragraph comprehensible or meaningless? Feel
your mind sort through potential explanations. Now watch
what happens with the presentation of a single word: kite
Tonight, onstage, for one night only---High Magic & Low Puns!
F. Scott Fitzgerald described an easy-to-accept but
difficult-to-accomplish solution: "The test of a first
rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed
ideas in the mind at the same time and still retain
the ability to function."
"Everything Connects":
By mimicking the way the brain processes information,
A.I. scientists have been able to build artificial neural
networks (ANNs) that can play chess and poker, read
faces, recognize speech and recommend books at
Amazon.com. While standard computer programs work
line by line, yes or no, all eventualities programmed in
advance, the ANN takes an entirely different approach.
The ANN is based upon mathematical programs that
are initially devoid of any specific values. The program-
mers only provide the equations; incoming information
determines how connections are formed and how strong
each connection will be in relationship to all other con-
nections. There is no predictable solution to a problem
-- rather, as one connection changes, so do all the
others. These shifting interrelationships are the basis
for "learning."
With an ANN, the hidden layer is conceptually located
within the interrelationships between all the incoming
information and the mathematical code used to process
it. In the human brain, the hidden layer doesn't exist as
a discrete interface or specific anatomic structure; rather,
it resides within the connections between all neurons
involved in any neural network. A network can be
relatively localized or widely distributed throughout the
brain. Proust's taste of a madeleine triggered a memory
that involved visual, auditory, olfactory and gustatory
cortices -- the multisensory cortical representations of a
complex memory. With a sufficiently sensitive fMRI scan,
we would see all these areas lighting up when Proust
contemplated the madeleine.
http://www.salon.com/mwt/mind_reader/2008/02/29/certainty/index.html
I have a notion, which is mine [sounds of altogether too much throat
clearing, much squirming in the seat, about three or four false
starts. . . .] I have the notion of Metagnosis. Gnosis is seeing/knowing the
true light of G-D, to be wrapped up in mystical unity and timelessless, if
only for the usual paradoxical moment. Metagnosis is knowing what
chemical and neural interactions created that moment. The Technologies
of the Sacred---meditation, shamanism, ceremonial magic---work towards
that light, that sensation of knowing, those paradoxical moments of
illumination. Metagnosis is having the phone number of "that man behind
the curtain" in your rolodex.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list