Rating ATD

Mark Kohut markekohut at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 8 15:44:41 CDT 2008


I have been v. busy lately to take up Laura's nice request to sum up
AtD...I did make some notes on a bus trip (which I hope i can find).

But, in short, my opinion is that AtD is more ambitious than anything else
TRP has written---up there with the most ambitious books ever....

HERE COMES EVERYTHING (play on Joyce's HERE COMES EVERYBODY)...a lifetime
of all he has observed, thought and felt. 

Laughably full of flaws, at times, it is a deeper, richer, fuller book than
even the intensely great "Gravity's Rainbow". And the wonderful "Mason & Dixon".   


A monstrous misshapen--'and who should he run into but'--- poem-like structure full of lyricism worth singing and some of the most 
overarching metaphoric ideas---Iceland Spar; time; maths---any writer has
ever put down.    



--- On Mon, 9/8/08, kelber at mindspring.com <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:

> From: kelber at mindspring.com <kelber at mindspring.com>
> Subject: Rating ATD
> To: pynchon-l at waste.org
> Date: Monday, September 8, 2008, 4:06 PM
> For most of us on the list (I think), GR is Pynchon's
> masterpiece, setting the bar impossibly high for anything
> else he's written or will ever write to surpass it.  But
> I know there are quite a few people here who prefer other of
> his books (might Bekah, Robin, and Mike Bailey be included? 
> Forgive me if I'm wrong).  I'd be particularly
> interested in what those people have to say about ATD -- how
> it stacks up against TRP's other books.
> 
> For me, ATD's principle flaw was the lack of a single
> or at least dual protagonist.  I think I understand why
> Pynchon made this choice.  A book that has the chaos of WWI,
> anarchy, modernity, etc. at its core is too big for a single
> viewpoint.  On the other hand, there's a significant
> focus on duality, which could have provided a context for a
> dual protagonist.  Using the Chums of Chance as a kind of
> group protagonist might be intellectually interesting, but
> it's emotionally flat.  The point of a protagonist is to
> give us an emotional, visceral connection to the story. 
> Slothrop isn't present in much of GR, but he still
> provides an emotional thread through the whole book. 
> Oedipa's present throughout COL49, and we share her
> paranoia throughout.  M&D and V (Stencil/Profane) have
> dual protagonists.  That they interact weakly in V makes
> that book less emotionally satisfying (and TRP's books
> are emotional.  If they were just cerebral exercises, I
> don't think we'd all be here obse!
>  ssing over him).  Zoyd seems to be the protagonist of
> Vineland (in that we meet him first), but, unlike Slothrop
> or Oedipa, its not about his quest, which weakens both his
> protagonist status and the book as a whole.
> 
> The group read gave me a lot of new insights into ATD and
> made me appreciate the book much more.  But it didn't
> alter my estimation of how it ranks with TRP's other
> novels:
> 
> 1. GR
> 2. V(the young Pynchon) tied with M&D (the mature
> Pynchon)
> 3. COL49
> 4. ATD
> 5. Vineland
> 
> Laura


      



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list