re. Beatles/Stones

[Carvill John]

> the Beatles always kept their approach to music intellectually
> engaging, where the Stones reach down for the belly response. Both
> are delightful experiences on different levels and preference comes
> down to what you most like to have tickled.


Well, I respectfully but very strongly disagree with that. The Beatles please the head and the heart, they are just as capable of triggering a belly response as teh Stones, but they can do so many other things that the Stones cannot. 


I'm aware of the thinness of the ice we're slipping out onto here. Passions run high, and imho's apply. But the Stones weren't a patch on the Beatles. 


_________________________________________________________________
Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for Hotmail®. 
http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/LearnMore/personalize.aspx?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_express:082009