re. Beatles/Stones

[Ian Livingston]

>> the Beatles always kept their approach to music intellectually
>> engaging, where the Stones reach down for the belly response. Both
>> are delightful experiences on different levels and preference comes
>> down to what you most like to have tickled.
>
>
> Well, I respectfully but very strongly disagree with that. The Beatles please the head and the heart, they are just as capable of triggering a belly response as teh Stones, but they can do so many other things that the Stones cannot.

I wonder, then, do you also disagree strongly the two sentences
following the comment you isolated above?

On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Carvill John<johncarvill at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> the Beatles always kept their approach to music intellectually
>> engaging, where the Stones reach down for the belly response. Both
>> are delightful experiences on different levels and preference comes
>> down to what you most like to have tickled.
>
>
> Well, I respectfully but very strongly disagree with that. The Beatles please the head and the heart, they are just as capable of triggering a belly response as teh Stones, but they can do so many other things that the Stones cannot.
>
>
> I'm aware of the thinness of the ice we're slipping out onto here. Passions run high, and imho's apply. But the Stones weren't a patch on the Beatles.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express your personality in color! Preview and select themes for Hotmail®.
> http://www.windowslive-hotmail.com/LearnMore/personalize.aspx?ocid=PID23391::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HYGN_express:082009