Stoners' droop, misc. IV

[Page]

No, no. Sorry.

I was merely making a joke regarding the bullshit article about fucking. I 
certainly was not being dismissive. At least it was not my intent. I was 
merely using your comment as context for the start of a joke (that went 
wrong). My comment was intended to riff off the Subject Line, not you.

I apologize if I gave offense.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robin Landseadel" <robinlandseadel at comcast.net>
To: <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: Stoners' droop, misc. IV


> On Aug 25, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Page wrote:
>
>> rich quotes Robin:
>>
>> crap
>>
>> Page revises:
>>
>> Fucking bullshit.
>
> I was merely paraphrasing "Alice", as "she" claimed that IV was crap.
> I assumed that everything else "she" would be writing on the subject
> would be coming from the same sort of spiritual & intellectual space.
>
> To clarify—if your very first mention of the subject at hand is 100%
> dismissive, why bother to say anything more?
>
>
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.63/2316 - Release Date: 08/20/09 
18:06:00
-------------- next part --------------

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.63/2316 - Release Date: 08/20/09 18:06:00