Not Drugs The Anatomy of Melville's Melancholy (Thoreau:

Robin Landseadel robinlandseadel at comcast.net
Sun Nov 15 18:40:57 CST 2009


On Nov 15, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Mark Kohut wrote:

> I was so blinkered. I do not remember seeing our soldiers on drugs  
> on TV news. Just remember the major 'news' shots and the steady  
> drumbeat of the war and protests against.

I remember my uncle coming home from Vietnam around '66, working post- 
war for an aerospace firm but also still a junkie from experiences in  
'Nam..

> Discussion question:
> Were "addictive" drugs, as they spread out from more limited  
> circles, such as musicians' worlds, the inherent vice?

"Inherent Vice" also pretty much includes a galaxy full of entropic  
processes including self-destruction via drugs and late capitalism. I  
suppose the Inherent Vice of simply being alive—the inevitability of  
death, a subject the author touched upon quite eloquently in "Slow  
Learner—needs to be figured into the mix as well. Getting old, memory  
getting messed up or maybe even pre-messed on account of an excess of  
Mindless Pleasures; it all comes with the territory of turning 70 or so.

> This question presumes pot is not addictive yet that 'harder' ones  
> are. Which might be one way Pynchon sees it??

Remember that the one time Doc gets a bad trip on weed is when he's  
dosed with PCP. Other folks throughout the book get burned by a host  
of other drugs, but getting burnt by weed is comparatively rare. Denis  
might seem like a casualty of weed, but it's equally possible he was  
born stupid. After all—one does not get to pick and choose one's  
neighbors in an apartment complex.







More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list