Re: IVIV (15) 273—7000 Romaine, Los Angeles 38

[alice wellintown]

Why do all roads lead to Camelot?  Again, I'm suggesting that the
reader has constructed a road and taken it there. That road needs to
veer off the pages of the work under consideration and, after this
strong reading builds a road, it also builds a rocket and takes a deep
voyage into the ever expanding universe of conspiracy. The text (IV)
is left behind as the reader responds to echoes of notes he or she is
tuned into. Because those notes are played from a constellation of
instruments or conspiracy texts about a conspiracy the size of the
sun, the tiny voice of the text is left standing on the launch
platform pointing to the inherent virtues of the text. Alas, the
rocket readers have landed in the desert, a high Howard Hughs at the
helm.


2009/11/22 Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net>:
> Well I came to the same historic focal point of the assassination of RFK a
> few weeks ago by a different route from Robin, based on the same text.  I
> think is is a very logical place to end up and an incredibly important one.
> If JFK and RFK were killed in CIA type operations and that was covered up,
> the whole history of the US has to be looked at completely differently. But
> the difficulty of penetrating the cult of power that surrounds the
> CIA/POTUS/ Weapons,international corporations,big oil, big media is as
> likely as Doc's chances against the Golden Fang.
> If Meir produces the most compelling proof that RFK was killed by agents of
> an American power broker-Hughes, Nixon, CIA  or other it would still be
> dismissed. No amount of proof is likely to penetrate the current paradigm
> where anything that happened before last year is ancient history.
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:16 PM, alice wellintown wrote:
>
>> Put any persons of equal power and wealth (HH & Nixon) at the center
>> of the text and one may construct a conspiracy reading from the
>> punctuation alone; this kind of reading is like the readings of a
>> concrete poem or Rorschach. Of course, adding the giant assassination
>> conspiracy theory (JFK, RFK, MLK) to the mix, playing record backward,
>> will always produce something like, "I burried Paul" or "Paul is
>> Dead."
>>
>>
>>
>> 2009/11/22 Robin Landseadel <robinlandseadel at comcast.net>:
>>>
>>> On Nov 22, 2009, at 8:14 AM, Mark Kohut wrote:
>>>
>>>> . . . . Hughes as himself is ALSO a near-perfect synechdoche for P's
>>>> themes of money and power. . .
>>>
>>> . . . military-industrial complex [Hughes Aircraft, TRW, ] CIA
>>> involvement,
>>> Watergate, Aeronautic design, "The Space Race," Film Noir [Scarface, The
>>> Racket, ], movies in general [acquisition of RKO, "Hell's Angels", The
>>> Outlaw,Two Arabian Knights, The Front Page], Tubaholism, Obsession with
>>> privacy, crazed drug consumption, "The Power Behind the Power" [buying
>>> off
>>> President Nixon, derailing Nixon's first Presidential campaign] . . . .
>>>
>>> And this: probable involvement in the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy—
>>>
>>>       Meier worked for Hughes during the era when Robert Maheu,
>>>       the CIA's handpicked man to plot Castro's assassination, was
>>>       running the Howard Hughes organization. CIA money flowed
>>>       freely through the Hughes organization, finding its way to
>>>       political candidates that included Gerald Ford, the Warren
>>>       Commission member who would eventually become President.
>>>
>>>       I had gone to talk to him about Howard Hughes, about whom I
>>>       was much interested. On the way to see him, I called Meier to
>>>       check in. He told me he had just gotten a call from Robert
>>>       Maheu, asking, hey John, how are you doing. Is there anything
>>>       you need? Meier thought that was bizarre, since they hadn't
>>>       talked in ten years. I thought it was more than sinister that the
>>>       very day I was on my way to see Meier he would hear from
>>>       Maheu.
>>>
>>>       Meier showed me his city, his home, his children, and talked to
>>>       me of some general data re his murder charge, which was
>>>       eventually proven false. (See the book Age of Secrets for the
>>>       full account of that horrific saga.) Meier told me near the end of
>>>       our conversation that he and J. Edgar Hoover had discussed
>>>       the RFK assassination at one point, and that Hoover had told
>>>       him, look, we know this was a Maheu job, but I'm powerless
>>>       against the CIA. At the time, that statement rang true to me
>>>       based on the research I had done to date. In the years since, I
>>>       continue to be persuaded that there may be much truth to that
>>>       statement.
>>>
>>>       For years I've been hoping Meier would tell what else he knew
>>>       about the case. Today, he started, by releasing this statement,
>>>       which I understand is simply the tip of the iceberg.
>>>
>>>       I am not passing judgment on the veracity of his information
>>>       until more of it is known. For now, I'm simply sharing this
>>>       provocative statement and waiting for the proverbial other shoe
>>>       to drop. I may yet have reason to rebut all of this. But I need to
>>>       see more data first.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://realhistoryarchives.blogspot.com/2008/06/john-meier-says-howard-hughes.html
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGAHYTu_6wg
>>>
>>> http://www.johnhmeier.com/
>>>
>
>