P defends V. ...

[alice wellintown]

Also, what Robin tried to argue is that LOT49 is exempt from the
author's critique in SL Intro.
This is also a dishonest and unfaithful reading of the given text.
Once it was proved that Robin's reading can not be supported by the
text, he reverted to the old "the author is using deliberate
ambiguity" and we, once again, fail to see what Robin sees between the
lines.