IVIV music
Keith
keithsz at mac.com
Wed Jan 13 20:35:02 CST 2010
On Jan 13, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Mark Kohut wrote:
It's not one literal time in history....as metaphor, it varies by books.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wasn't commenting on whether or not TRP made the point, but
disagreeing with the point. I see no evidence that we've lost the
'simply human' any more now than at previous points in history.
There's always the same percentage of humanity and inhumanity applied
to whatever is happening in the big picture whether it's
technological or any other -ological. The humane/inhumane or simple
human/non-simple human indices are constant. It's easy to idealize a
past we weren't present in, to suggest that had something that has
been lost. Things are the same blend of fucked and fabulous at all
times. There is no progress, and there is no regress. Having said
that, I don't think Pynchon is even making the point you interpret
his work as making, that something 'more simple' has been lost. His
art is much broader, more complex, non-preachy, and non-ideological,
in my opinion.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-io-kZKl_BI
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list