rebuttal of earlier post

[Michael Bailey]

Klein'd need more data points to be convincing.
But the rebutter'd need more buttressing to uproot the seed she
planted thoroughly enough that nothing remained of it....

it's an intriguing pattern, and like other conspiracy theories I could
mention, the most persuasive bit of evidence is one's impression of
the type of people the potential perps (ie, in this case, Congress)
seem to be...



On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Ian Livingston
<igrlivingston at gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.alternet.org/story/153222/naomi_wolf%E2%80%99s_%E2%80%98shocking_truth%E2%80%99_about_the_%E2%80%98occupy_crackdowns%E2%80%99_offers_anything_but_truth/?page=entire
>
> --
> "Less than any man have I  excuse for prejudice; and I feel for all
> creeds the warm sympathy of one who has come to learn that even the
> trust in reason is a precarious faith, and that we are all fragments
> of darkness groping for the sun. I know no more about the ultimates
> than the simplest urchin in the streets." -- Will Durant
>