Nedd Ludd's Privileged Professionals

[Joseph Navarro]

Perhaps we can agree that the elite "artisan" status that the Luddites
protested against losing, would certainly do our current American economic
hierarchy a lot of good.  The economic divide between those who have a B.A.
or more advanced and those who have merely a H.S. diploma or G.E.D., is
becoming irrelevant.  The salary earner is going the way of the wage
earner, as the intrinsic benefits that government and private corporations
traditionally maintained for their citizens and workers, are now being
removed.  Maybe the rise of the Luddite was a sign of times to come; the
beginning of the current global economic Praxis in which a majority of the
worlds wealth is consolidated into 1% of the worlds population.


On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:21 AM, rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:

> history is nuance, it the mere-playthings of kings, corporations,
> churches, artists, anarchists, and cooperatives
> i believe in her only and shit on all her suitors
>
> rich
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Bekah <bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> Yes,  the Luddites were artisans and craftsmen (with various levels of
>> skill)  who were actually displaced.  They were not the lowest class of
>> worker who, being capable of working the machines,  displaced them.
>>
>> Bekah
>> Books will get you through times of no money better than money will get
>> you through times of no books.
>>
>>
>> On Apr 12, 2012, at 7:37 AM, Mark Kohut wrote:
>>
>> > A distinction without a difference, as philosophy profs used to say
>> which I
>> > repeat confidently,  lacking any historical knowlege of the
>> situation....
>> >
>> > From: rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com>
>> > To: "“pynchon-l at waste.org“" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
>> > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:56 AM
>> > Subject: Nedd Ludd's Privileged Professionals
>> >
>> > http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/rage-against-the-machine/
>> >
>> > 'Now a study by Richard Jones, a research student at the University of
>> Cambridge, suggests that Luddism may be celebrated for the wrong reasons.
>> He argues that it was not a movement which represented the concerns of the
>> working classes at all – rather those of privileged professionals with
>> disparate, local concerns. In a British textile industry that employed a
>> million people, the movement’s numbers never rose above a couple of
>> thousand.
>> >
>> > “For historians, the Luddites have traditionally been seen as a
>> phenomenon of social history,” Jones said. “They are viewed as workers
>> dispossessed by economic advances, frozen out of existing structures and
>> doing whatever they could to make their voices heard. But these were not
>> downtrodden working class labourers – the Luddites were elite craftspeople.”
>> >
>> > ...
>> > Jones believes that this smallness of scale reflects the fact that
>> Luddism was far from a genuinely pan-working class movement. Instead,
>> Luddites were skilled workers – a relatively “elite” group, whose role had
>> traditionally been protected by legislation regulating the supply and
>> conduct of labour.
>> > This centuries-old body of laws had also laid down rules for access to
>> certain professional roles, such as the “croppers”, or cloth dressers, who
>> led the rebellion in Yorkshire. These skilled workers had to spend seven
>> years in apprenticeships before they could take up their chosen profession.
>> At the end of it, they tended to feel that they were owed a living.
>> > New machinery in the textile sector was starting to deny them this. For
>> the real working classes, however, that was an old story – many unskilled
>> jobs had long-since been displaced by technological advances and there was
>> little reason for these groups to get involved in an uprising in 1811/12.'
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120412/2d5be67e/attachment.html>