Is the uncertainty principle culturally deranging?
Paul Mackin
mackin.paul at verizon.net
Thu Aug 2 11:06:30 CDT 2012
On 8/2/2012 11:17 AM, Prashant Kumar wrote:
> Isn't it the literary equivalent of masturbating in public?
Swan's Way and the Education of Henry Adams were first privately published.
Shakespeare & Company, which came out first with Ulysses in its
entirety, wasn't the normal sort of publisher.
Don't know if any of these gentlemen did the other things too,
P
>
> P.
>
> On 3 August 2012 00:16, Madeleine Maudlin <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com
> <mailto:madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I've not looked into self-publishing. That's what AuthorHouse is
> isn't it?
>
> It says it's free, what's the problem there. I mean, how does one
> go wrong with self-publishing, how can that ever go wrong? You
> take your manuscript to a printer, basically, or is there more to it.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com
> <mailto:markekohut at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
> De range hand say: DO NOT EVER PUBLISH WITH AUTHORHOUSE.
> You're welcome.
>
> *From:* Madeleine Maudlin <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com
> <mailto:madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com>>
> *To:* Paul Mackin <mackin.paul at verizon.net
> <mailto:mackin.paul at verizon.net>>
> *Cc:* pynchon-l at waste.org <mailto:pynchon-l at waste.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 1, 2012 4:33 PM
> *Subject:* Re: Is the uncertainty principle culturally deranging?
>
> Oh der/anging/. Mr. Kohut is certainly /that/. I would never
> use that word though, or any deranged derivative there, hem,
> of. If I did it would be in the best sense possible, which
> for me would be exceedingly /good/.
>
> Does anybody write here? I just got an email, who knows why
> I'm on their list, I haven't tried to publish anything in
> years, from a place called AuthorHouse, subject says Publish
> today and get a no-cost bump-up. So I guess it's free, today,
> if you want to get published. I'm currently stuck on page 400
> hell with no end in sight. 432. What is it about 400? The
> Moon is 400 times smaller than the Sun and 400 times closer to
> it than the Earth, or something. Bumping-up, m
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Paul Mackin
> <mackin.paul at verizon.net <mailto:mackin.paul at verizon.net>> wrote:
>
> On 8/1/2012 10:23 AM, Prashant Kumar wrote:
>> Yes.
>
>
> but not pejoratively so I hope
>
> P
>
>
>>
>> P.
>>
>> On 1 August 2012 23:52, Paul Mackin
>> <mackin.paul at verizon.net
>> <mailto:mackin.paul at verizon.net>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1976/oct/28/plastic-fiction-3/
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120802/3be745cd/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list