Difficult Books

Mark Kohut markekohut at yahoo.com
Thu Aug 9 09:47:52 CDT 2012


And I'll bet the list is much more garth than emily. I'll bet you you can break the email code at PW to woo Ms. Emily.
 
Speaking of existential phenomenology, I resent myself for bothering to waste time with this thread. "you talkin to me
again, Kohut?"..
 
See you back in AtD.....a non-difficult book to read that is as difficult as any/most? on this list.....

From: Madeleine Maudlin <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com>
To: Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> 
Cc: David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>; pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org> 
Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: Difficult Books


Actually by way of me commenting on my own brilliant last post since obviously no one else will, Proust's whole thing is existential phenomenology.  Whether you want to say that makes Proust philosophy or the phenomenologists fictionalists whatevers.


On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:

Agree. Category error as myt philosophy teachers used to say. Thought it was just me.
>or else the list should be on non-fiction books, full of lots of philosophy.
> 
>I think they created this list out of their private life's reading too much, too much the private reading of two.
>
>
>From: David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
>To: Madeleine Maudlin <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com> 
>Cc: Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>; Phillip Grayson <phillip.grayson at gmail.com>; John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com>; Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com>; Keith Davis <kbob42 at gmail.com>; pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org> 
>Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2012 10:00 AM
>Subject: Re: Difficult Books
>
>
>I also don't think philosophy books should be included in a list like this.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120809/d7eb5621/attachment.html>


More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list