Difficult Books
Madeleine Maudlin
madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 12:12:44 CDT 2012
Are you mad at me, or the list. Wwwwhy would you bet I can break codes,
I'm just curious.
What a nap I've just had. Is it midday already. And what extraordinary
dreams last night. Does Heidegger cover dreaming in Being in Time, I
forget. Surely it's some function of living inauthentickly.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
> And I'll bet the list is much more garth than emily. I'll bet you you can
> break the email code at PW to woo Ms. Emily.
>
> Speaking of existential phenomenology, I resent myself for bothering to
> waste time with this thread. "you talkin to me
> again, Kohut?"..
>
> See you back in AtD.....a non-difficult book to read that is as difficult
> as any/most? on this list.....
>
> *From:* Madeleine Maudlin <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com>
> *To:* Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>
> *Cc:* David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>; pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 9, 2012 10:14 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Difficult Books
>
> Actually by way of me commenting on my own brilliant last post since
> obviously no one else will, Proust's *whole thing* is existential
> phenomenology. Whether you want to say that makes Proust philosophy or the
> phenomenologists fictionalists whatevers.
>
> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Agree. Category error as myt philosophy teachers used to say. Thought it
> was just me.
> or else the list should be on non-fiction books, full of lots of
> philosophy.
>
> I think they created this list out of their private life's reading too
> much, too much the private reading of two.
>
> *From:* David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
> *To:* Madeleine Maudlin <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>; Phillip Grayson <
> phillip.grayson at gmail.com>; John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com>; Dave Monroe
> <against.the.dave at gmail.com>; Keith Davis <kbob42 at gmail.com>; pynchon -l <
> pynchon-l at waste.org>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 9, 2012 10:00 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Difficult Books
>
> I also don't think philosophy books should be included in a list like this.
>
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120809/1546b233/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list