..Not in the least bit Pynchonic -- space

[Mark Kohut]

I kant say (but that it) is an apriori truth, is space, although synthetic too.


From: Bled Welder <bledwelder at hotmail.com>
To: fqmorris at gmail.com; clayjon at hotmail.com 
Cc: pynchon-l at waste.org; estaphin at hotmail.com; rights at bloodaxebooks.com; jenshut at hotmail.com; bike at emap.com; tania at rouxblom.fslife.co.uk; cemery at saltpublishing.com; joe.brooker at english.bbk.ac.uk; phil.coombe at oracle.com 
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 10:31 AM
Subject: RE: ..Not in the least bit Pynchonic -- space


I suppose I could go onto a science-l whatever, but that sounds like a hassle and you people seem to might be able to answer this question that bugs me: okay getting beyond the thing that Einstein was wrong, it'll be happening any day now, what is space?

More specifickly, whenever I see examples of it, space is on a flat plane, then objects do their little push into the "fabric" of it --and case! everything is on the same frikkin plane.

Is everything on the same frikkin plane, indenting?  I don't even know if the Moon circles on the same plane as Earth does the sun.  Are all planets in the same orbital format?  You know what I mean here?      b
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120201/15b23b6b/attachment.html>