Can you NOT think of the ending of GR?
Paul Mackin
mackin.paul at verizon.net
Wed Jul 25 06:21:15 CDT 2012
On 7/24/2012 10:17 PM, Ian Livingston wrote:
> After having seen myself and a number of others wounded pretty badly
> over the course of a few years, I am less queasy about blood and pain
> than I once was. Movie blood, whether tomato juice or chocolate syrup,
> never bothered me at all.
During the 8 seasons of "24" I become easily inured to tv torture. The
first season was a little shocking, and I think only Jack's fists were
used to get the truth out of them, but after that, they could bring on
any fiendish devise they could think up.
P
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com
> <mailto:markekohut at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
> A high school friend has been quoted as saying he, suspect. always
> identified with the bad guys in superhero movies. Weird, I think
> the friend said...
> I am a vile man. I am a spiteful man----Notes from Underground.....
>
> *From:* Alex Colter <recoignishon at gmail.com
> <mailto:recoignishon at gmail.com>>
> *To:* Bekah <bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net
> <mailto:bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net>>
> *Cc:* Erik T. Burns <eburns at gmail.com <mailto:eburns at gmail.com>>;
> "malignd at aol.com <mailto:malignd at aol.com>" <malignd at aol.com
> <mailto:malignd at aol.com>>; "pynchon-l at waste.org
> <mailto:pynchon-l at waste.org>" <pynchon-l at waste.org
> <mailto:pynchon-l at waste.org>>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 24, 2012 8:56 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: Can you NOT think of the ending of GR?
>
> Apparently Holmes was accepted into the "cream of the crop" summer
> boot camp run by Miramar college for writing, while still in high
> school a computer program that illustrates "temporary perceptions
> of causality and programmed a flicker fusion utility". Flicker
> fusion being a lively Topic of interest for those Devotees of Xi
> Nao (brainwashing).
> It also seems, and this has been a lively topic for the popular
> Paranoids, that he took part in research programs while at Salk
> that were directly funded by DARPA...?
>
> Certainly a few smoking guns here. but one would do well to not
> trust everything the internet tells us.
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Bekah <bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net
> <mailto:bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net>> wrote:
>
> I wasn't criticizing parents! I was curious to know if the
> movie was seriously violent - that's it. What kind of movie
> would a very intelligent bizerko pull out the guns for? I was
> thinking he was going for audience size, not the violence of
> the film.
>
> Bek
>
> On Jul 24, 2012, at 5:45 PM, "Erik T. Burns" <eburns at gmail.com
> <mailto:eburns at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> >What sort of parent brings these children to midnight movies
>> of any sort?
>>
>> Y'know, under most circumstances I would agree with this
>> sentiment. But the issue here is not the "bad parenting" of
>> the audience, it's the fuckwit with the guns. The killer, not
>> his victims.
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:23 PM, <malignd at aol.com
>> <mailto:malignd at aol.com>> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think this appalling fact has much to do with the
>> quality of the movie. What sort of parent brings these
>> children to midnight movies of any sort?
>>
>> Has anyone here seen the movie? There were 6-year
>> olds and younger there and nobody has criticized that
>> (to my knowledge).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bekah <bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net
>> <mailto:bekah0176 at sbcglobal.net>>
>> To: Paul Mackin <mackin.paul at verizon.net
>> <mailto:mackin.paul at verizon.net>>
>> Cc: pynchon-l <pynchon-l at waste.org
>> <mailto:pynchon-l at waste.org>>
>> Sent: Tue, Jul 24, 2012 6:21 pm
>> Subject: Re: Can you NOT think of the ending of GR?
>>
>> Has anyone here seen the movie? There were 6-year olds
>> and younger there and nobody has criticized that (to my
>> knowledge).
>>
>> Bekah
>>
>> http://beckylindroos.wordpress.com/
>>
>> On Jul 24, 2012, at 3:44 PM, Paul Mackin
>> <mackin.paul at verizon.net
>> <mailto:mackin.paul at verizon.net>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/24/2012 4:01 PM, Mark Kohut wrote:
>>>> "This willing dissociation of response from violent
>>>> spectacle has a
>>>> downside, as many people have said: we become inured to
>>>> actual
>>>> violence when it excites us on; we forget that that
>>>> there’s pain and
>>>> death, we become connoisseurs of spectacle
>>>
>>> Can there be "willing dissociation of response from
>>> violent spectacle" if the spectacle isn't seriously
>>> violent in the first place. Is Batman movie "violence"
>>> even violent enough to dissociate from?
>>>
>>> I'm asking for information. Way too old to judge for myself.
>>>
>>> P
>>>
>>>
>>>> . This kind of
>>>> connoisseurship showed up in the response to 9/11,
>>>> which many people,
>>>> with obvious relish as well as awe, said resembled a
>>>> movie, a remark
>>>> that left anyone with half a brain feeling queasy, if
>>>> not furious." —
>>>> David Denby, The New Yorker
>>>> Many said it without any relish. & Pynchon has
>>>> half-a-brain and
>>>> he was furious (in GR).......
>>>>
>>>> He (and many others) go there: "Blame the movie, not
>>>> the guns/killer."
>>>>
>>>> David Morris
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:50 PM, David Morris
>>>> <fqmorris at gmail.com <mailto:fqmorris at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> > Ban Batman, not guns!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> "Less than any man have I excuse for prejudice; and I feel for all
> creeds the warm sympathy of one who has come to learn that even the
> trust in reason is a precarious faith, and that we are all fragments
> of darkness groping for the sun. I know no more about the ultimates
> than the simplest urchin in the streets." -- Will Durant
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120725/555d9923/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list