Back to AtD: Ewball makes a distinction, p. 922

[rich]

sounds alot like counter-terrorism, too. didnt work for the french or
the US in iraq/afghan (as it didnt work in Vietnam--check out adam
curtis latest post The Rational Peasant)

nor i should mention, the IRA when they decided to branch out attacks
in Britain proper

there is no professional way. just senseless slaughter seems to me

rich



On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Mark Kohut <markekohut at yahoo.com> wrote:
> "There's plenty of folks who deserve being blown up, to be sure, " opined
> Ewball, "but they've got to
> be gone after in a professional way, anything else is being just like them,
> slaughterin the innocent, when what
> we need is more slaughterin of the guilty. Who gave the orders, who carried
> 'em out, exact names and
> whereabouts--and then go get 'em. That'd be just honest soldierin"...
>