List of agnostics

[Alex Colter]

Sure GR's core is deeply Agnostic, but M&D is a different thing altogether.
Tho' Cherrycoke is of a somewhat dubious orthodoxy he certainly worships
Christ and misses no opportunity to ridicule Deism...?
Presbyterian myself,
Did someone really insist that we were atheists?
some people on this list......

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:39 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> I've played with the I Ching (not seriously enough to say I've studied
> it) one of the oldest of the Chinese classic texts.  At its heart it
> is a representation of the universe (maybe the source of Taoism), and
> its structure starts with two elements, yang & yin, symbolically
> corresponding  to male and female.  So it would agree to a universe of
> two frequencies, but they wouldn't be fear and love.  The range of
> opposites would be infinite, thus the spinning duality of the yin/yang
> mandala.
>
> David Morris
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Phillip Greenlief <pgsaxo at pacbell.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Madeleine Maudlin <madeleinemaudlin at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: List of agnostics
> >
> > Some say that there are but two primary vibrations in the world, of which
> > all things are varying frequencies: fear and love.  Fear, they say, are
> the
> > lower frequencies; love the higher.  The higher frequencies are more
> > energetic.  I don't think many will disagree, or all will concede the
> idea,
> > that higher energy is a manifestation of greater power.
> >
> > Nietzsche, the greatest of life-affirming humans, proclaimed that life
> is a
> > will to power.
> >
> > How does that sound?
> >
> > ***********************
> > i like the first statement, it is indeed something i've thought about
> > repeatedly. the universe revolving on two basic frequencies is a taoist
> > principle, methinks. the two sides of the taoist coin depend on one
> another
> > ... conflict is the axis upon which the tao spins ...  no conflict: no
> drama
> > - no literature, no art, no music, politics, etc. etc. etc. in that way,
> is
> > it perhaps inevitable that americans will continue to spin on the axis of
> > the two-party system?
> >
> > and yet, i don't truly see how fear can be a frequency that "just
> exists" -
> > because it is usually in reaction to something. it is possible that when
> > human consciousness apprehends the infinite nature of the universe, fear
> > will naturally follow ... like, how can you navigate something that is
> > endless, something whose form is a mystery?
> >
> > love seems something that you can possess - for humanity, for example,
> not
> > talking about a specific, romantic love for another person -
> unconditional
> > love can exist without responding to anything in particular. whereas
> fear is
> > something that comes from apprehending something you don't understand ...
> > yet.
> >
> > just responding, not attempting to propose answers to this puzzle.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20120627/a07f7436/attachment.html>