Gravity again - whoa thar!
bandwraith at aol.com
bandwraith at aol.com
Mon Apr 15 16:24:47 CDT 2013
Re: Sokal, that might have been me:
http://waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l&month=1304&msg=172302&sort=date
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Cissell <macissell at yahoo.es>
To: Monte Davis <montedavis at verizon.net>; pynchon-l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Mon, Apr 15, 2013 4:57 pm
Subject: Re: Gravity again - whoa thar!
Dear Monte (& Rev. 76),
Not all of us on the P-list hit on the "par" that Monte refers to, and that is
ertainly present here as well as so many other places.
Somebody here mentioned the Sokal affair not long back and it wasn't picked up
n, a glaring silence passing over an uncomfortable subject. By the way, out of
hat whole affair Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont wrote "Fashionable Nonsense:
ostmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science", might be of interest. Also check
ut "Theory and Reality" by Peter Godfrey-Smith. Good stuff.
ciao
c otis
________________________________
From: Monte Davis <montedavis at verizon.net>
o: 'Rev'd Seventy-Six' <revd.76 at gmail.com>; pynchon-l at waste.org
ent: Monday, April 15, 2013 5:34 PM
ubject: RE: Gravity again
Also rather unlike any practitioner of science I know of or respect.
et used to it: that’s par for the course in characterizations of science and
echnology (and mischaracterizations pof Pynchon’s stance w/r/t them) around
ere.
ood post!
rom:owner-pynchon-l at waste.org [mailto:owner-pynchon-l at waste.org] On Behalf Of
ev'd Seventy-Six
ent: Monday, April 15, 2013 10:49 AM
o: pynchon-l at waste.org
ubject: Re: Gravity again
....the greater risk is science itself because it knows no limits. It cannot
in, there are no transgressions, the sacred is not a mystery but a profane
uzzle to be solved and then exploited."
olved, then exploited? Jeepers, harsh. Also rather unlike any practitioner of
cience I know of or respect.
It's not science fueling the impending apocalypse we glimpse in our rearview
hese days, it's overweening greed. "I need my night's blood, my funding,
unding, ahh more, more." Knowledge isn't dangerous, nor clarified insight into
he workings of the spheres, it's damnfool hubris that's the hazard.
cience can't sin. Its practitioners, I'll grant you, but not science. Like
eligion, science is all about limits; probing for them, determining them,
omprehending them and, occasionally, establishing new ones. Unlike religion,
cience is fairly self-aware in that respect. There's no 'sin' in knowledge
nless your fetish is eyeballing fruit in a nervous, god-fearing fashion.
ontrast this with the great many sins of ignorance: corporations who pay
orrupt scientific 'authorities' to deny climate change, for example, or
undamentalists who spin specious rules of biology for women from whole, shoddy
loth to disguise a cromag interest in the mindless, incautious propagation of
he species. Science would see us as enlightened & able as angels-- and
here's the sin in self-improvement, I ask you, long as it's not masturbatory
-no, it's men who would prefer to graze on all of Eden like locusts. I see P.
rawing this line again & again
throughout GR and elsewhere.
f his literary philosophy is in essence gnostic & predicated on the idea that
e occupy a 'fallen' universe where the living are used for the purposes of the
ead, and I view that as a grotesque oversimplication, P also recognizes that
he deathwish dystopia we've engineered for ourselves is as driven by bloody
oney as fatuous reasoning. The edge you allege he's lost is an erosion of the
apport you felt with earlier books & now no longer perceive. While 'lighter'
r at least less highfalutin', esoteric fare than GR, VL & IV are very much
bout would-be devils, dybbuks in human drapery, selling the ground from beneath
nborn feet. To accuse science of meddling in the affairs of god is a B-movie
eaction. Kekulé's dream of the benzene ring was a moment of sacred
nspiration; 'tis the abuses his work has been put toward that're profane.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130415/7e726d5d/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list