Gravity again

[Prashant Kumar]

Yep. Skipping a bit, thence to gravitons<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton>
 [en.wikipedia.org], skip a bit more, and hey:
holograms!<http://www.sns.ias.edu/~malda/sciam-maldacena-3a.pdf>
 [www.sns.ias.edu; .pdf]

P.


On 16 April 2013 08:03, <malignd at aol.com> wrote:

> Didn't Einstein define it as warps in space/time?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Livingston <igrlivingston at gmail.com>
> To: Lemuel Underwing <luunderwing at gmail.com>
> Cc: Markekohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>; pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
> Sent: Sun, Apr 14, 2013 3:09 pm
> Subject: Re: Gravity again
>
>  What is gravity? To the best of my knowledge it remains undefined among
> physicists. If Satan fell by cause of gravity, is gravity, then, whatever
> is down? That would make for an awful lot of downs, I guess.
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Lemuel Underwing <luunderwing at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> o-or something like that
>>
>>
>>  On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Lemuel Underwing <luunderwing at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Blake says that Gravity is but an invention of Newton.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Markekohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Satan, said Chesterton, fell through force of gravity.----C.S.Lewis,
>>>> 1960 preface to
>>>> The Screwtape Letters.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130416/1a1ecdac/attachment.html>