NP? modernity, terrorism, truth and relevance?

[bandwraith at aol.com]

I found " Wha?"  "You can't be serious" and "This is stupid." to be less than civil. To each his own. 



-----Original Message-----
From: alice wellintown <alicewellintown at gmail.com>
To: pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Sun, Apr 21, 2013 10:24 am
Subject: Re: NP? modernity, terrorism, truth and relevance?


I don't think I misread, nor were my comments meant to be arrogant or rude. 

On Sunday, April 21, 2013, wrote:

And you could be a little less arrogant and rude. I can see where she's coming from. You've probably miss read her, but even if not...



-----Original Message-----
From: alice wellintown <alicewellintown at gmail.com>
To: pynchon -l <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Sun, Apr 21, 2013 8:52 am
Subject: Re: NP? modernity, terrorism, truth and relevance?


Wha?
You can't be serious. This is stupid.
> On the other side, all those who hate the Globocracy: political progressives
 (who can get confused, because they're fighting against people who support
 many of the progressive issues they feel most passionate about),
 environmentalists, supporters of human rights, pacifists, humanists,
 Christian wingnuts, fascists, rightwing nationalists, Muslim
 fundamentalists, Orthodox Jews, and racists and hate-mongerers of all
 stripes. Much as I loathe who's lumped into this side, it's the side I most
 support. It's clearly the losing side. Pynchon, with his romanticizing of
 indigenous cultures, his disgust at colonialism, clearly falls into this
 side.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130421/d00f8008/attachment.html>