pynchon-l-digest V2 #9514

[Lewis Zhang]

Maybe it would be prudent and wait until we can read the novel before
assuming its contents?


On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Bled Welder <bledwelder at gmail.com> wrote:

> God I'm so fucking sorry to disappoint you, bro.
>
> What did I say.  That the buildings were built to be destroyed by their
> builders?
>
> Who gives a fat Fuck what Thomas Pynchon's opinion is?  If he wants to be
> a reet about it, then fair enough.  It's scary, I know.
>
> The question was how can we trust Pynchon.  The answer glued over your
> eyes is clearly : "Implictly."
>
> Mmmm, Oooohhhhhh, what's Pynchon's take on the falling towers?  Such a
> tragedy.  "We" would never do that to "ourselves".
>
> America is eternally Goooood.
>
> Right.  I'm sure Pynchon thinks that.  Why do you think he's been in
> hiding for 60 years, ya reet?
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Don Antenen <dantenen at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Disappointed to see 9/11 conspiracy theories on the list. Pynchon's work
>> seems so clearly to be a (beautiful, hilarious, complicated) demolition of
>> conspiracist thinking.
>>
>> all the best,
>> Donald
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130226/c910f135/attachment.html>