pynchon-l-digest V2 #9514

Bled Welder bledwelder at gmail.com
Tue Feb 26 19:49:20 CST 2013


That is true and fair enough.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Lewis Zhang <lewiszhang at gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe it would be prudent and wait until we can read the novel before
> assuming its contents?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Bled Welder <bledwelder at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> God I'm so fucking sorry to disappoint you, bro.
>>
>> What did I say.  That the buildings were built to be destroyed by their
>> builders?
>>
>> Who gives a fat Fuck what Thomas Pynchon's opinion is?  If he wants to be
>> a reet about it, then fair enough.  It's scary, I know.
>>
>> The question was how can we trust Pynchon.  The answer glued over your
>> eyes is clearly : "Implictly."
>>
>> Mmmm, Oooohhhhhh, what's Pynchon's take on the falling towers?  Such a
>> tragedy.  "We" would never do that to "ourselves".
>>
>> America is eternally Goooood.
>>
>> Right.  I'm sure Pynchon thinks that.  Why do you think he's been in
>> hiding for 60 years, ya reet?
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Don Antenen <dantenen at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Disappointed to see 9/11 conspiracy theories on the list. Pynchon's work
>>> seems so clearly to be a (beautiful, hilarious, complicated) demolition of
>>> conspiracist thinking.
>>>
>>> all the best,
>>> Donald
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130226/3e240837/attachment.html>


More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list