Tweet from Joyce Carol Oates (@JoyceCarolOates)
David Morris
fqmorris at gmail.com
Wed Mar 20 16:03:58 CDT 2013
And "dark matter" isn't really dark, just unknown and mostly invisible.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Henry M <scuffling at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see her suggesting that the "light" is better so much as that we
> are rarer than we knew, and that is "sobering."
>
>
> Yours truly,
> ٩(●̮̮̃•̃)۶
> Henry Musikar, CISSP
> http://astore.amazon.com/tdcoccamsaxe-20
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Ian Livingston <igrlivingston at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Or is that a prejudicial statement, based in our perceptions of light and
>> dark? Maybe we are really agents of darkness....
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Markekohut <markekohut at yahoo.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Joyce Carol Oates (@JoyceCarolOates<https://twitter.com/joycecaroloates>
>>> )*
>>> 3/20/13, 12:21 PM<https://twitter.com/joycecaroloates/status/314411384404332545>
>>> Sobering to think that all but a minuscule fraction of the universe is
>>> NOT "dark matter"--we represent the "light."
>>>
>>> Download the official Twitter app here<https://twitter.com/download?ref_src=MailTweet-iOS>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20130320/17779e87/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list