9-11 box cutters 11 september utility knives

[Joseph Tracy]

Have you read enough of the material on the site I mentioned to honestly dismiss the whole question?  Please at least spend some time with the part from first responders who report explosions in the basement before or very close to the plane hitting the building. To answer your question draws one toward an area of the research into 9-11 that is sketchy and hearsay but would be able to be thoroughly researched by a criminal investigation which  how this should be approached because it is the largest crime scene in US history. Pynchon also approaches it that way. But some claim that there was in fact work  done at the WTC in the evenings that could have allowed materials to be planted. Trying to defend this theory does not interest me nor many others who have the same questions. It is investigative police work.

Many  if not most people close to the scene report multiple explosions and the video shows spurts of firework like embers coming out the side of the building. 

Calling what these people are saying babble without even hearing it seems unduly harsh. I am not defending a private theory but asserting the credibility and substance of the questions asked. I hate Alex Jones and some of the blowhards involved but that is not the whole picture. 

On Nov 21, 2013, at 6:54 PM, David Morris wrote:

> Engineered implosion requires placement of explosives all connected to be sequentially detonated on multiple floor levels.  It is impossible to hide that level of engineering, all that dynomite, work that would have taken weeks to set in place. So please account for how all of that work was invisible to all the tenants in all their private offices, or then just stop surmising that engineered implosion is a possible explanation.  Or just continue to babble.
> 
> It is that simple.  Or explain how it's not.
> 
> David Morris
> 

-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l