Chabon on BE
Rich Clavey
antizoyd at yahoo.com
Sun Oct 20 18:30:44 CDT 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporary_Autonomous_Zone
--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 10/20/13, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: Chabon on BE
To: "Rich" <richard.romeo at gmail.com>
Cc: "John Bailey" <sundayjb at gmail.com>, "Michael Bailey" <michael.lee.bailey at gmail.com>, "P-list" <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Date: Sunday, October 20, 2013, 5:56 PM
But Pynchon's main point about all
these Zones is their brief existence. Small temporary
places beyond the reach of enslaving power. Always to be
briefly enjoyed before those spaces are colonized or
reclaimed.
On Sunday, October 20, 2013, Rich wrote:
As I've said before
Pynchon has left preterite somewheres
On Oct 20, 2013, at 3:21 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
It is an analogy, and
only one of many possible zones. Not that I espouse this
kind of zonal paradise. It just seems Pynchon repeated
model.
On Sunday, October 20, 2013, Rich wrote:
But what good is it if only accessible by the well
connected (haha)?
Hardly a paradise, no?
rich
On Oct 20, 2013, at 2:22 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
I think DA is supposed to
be internet Zone, anarchy, a place w/o rules or rulers.
Pynchon Paradise. What is it "for?" Wrong
question. What for do you want to make it?
David Morris
On Saturday, October 19, 2013, John Bailey wrote:
Yeah, I'm a bit confused about
DeepArcher too... as far as I can tell,
it's a program lodged in the deep web, which as you say
is basically
the "place" where IP addresses aren't
connected to DNS so won't show
up on any search engine, and you need a direct link or
knowledge of
the specific IP address to access it.
So that kind of makes sense - DeepArcher is a program with
Second
Life-like aspects that can't be accessed unless you have
the key. And
later on the security of the fortress is compromised, and
then the
gates are just thrown open and it basically leaves the Deep
Web and is
accessible from the surface.
What I really don't get is what the *hell* the program
is for. A
Second Life that only a handful of people can get into? And
do what?
The descriptions of Maxine's early journeys around the
place make it
seem like a point-and-click adventure game with no mystery
to it or
reason to play further. Except it has stunning graphics, for
the
era...
At first I thought it was a navigation system for travelling
through
the Deep Web but that doesn't really seem right, since
it would
basically be a search engine with graphical interface for
finding the
IP addresses of places that aren't meant to be findable.
Which would
be exactly the thing that would pose a threat to the entire
meaning of
the Deep Web, even if you could erase your footsteps the way
DA
promises.
Anyway, maybe that's the point - that this supposedly
subversive
method of total anonymity itself provides the architecture
for control
and surveillance and some sweet home shopping.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Michael Bailey
<michael.lee.bailey at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2013 7:09 PM, "Monte Davis" <montedavis at verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> Chabon is careless there. Ernie's capsule
history is not *historically*
>> baseless: yes, DARPA did fund some of the IT
research leading to TCP/IP
>> and
>> packet switching. And yes, the Cold War
justification for that funding
>> *was*
>> to develop a network technology that could
"work around" servers knocked
>> out
>> by enemy attack, so that government could keep
communicating.
>>
>
> One of my other favorite authors, John Crowley, in _The
Translator_
> made the female protagonist's dad a darpa dude and
evoked those times
> wonderfully.
>
> If we were gonna get crazy and do a non-p group read
like we did a few yrs
> back - I guess I finally thought of the one I'd
suggest (-:
>
> But getting back to BE, I sort of have a question about
this deep web where
> Deep Archer resides - does that correspond to anything
nonfictional? I mean
> are we talking about using a browser to navigate to
some bare IP address
> known not to dns at all but only to the cognoscenti?
Afaik there were bbses,
> ftp and gopher, and then all of a sudden there was
yahoo and aol and urls
> but nowhere was there anything like deep archer which
is sophisticated,
> ambiguous - nothing like the games I'm aware of -
plus it's more and less
> than a game, possibly even a place that responds to
users' emotional and
> spiritual states of mind and even a place where a
person can be said to
> reside while accessing it. Maybe a mmorpg or a Second
Life type
> environment?
>
> A development of the angelic realms alluded to at the
beginning of Vineland
> and the amazing things computers - the ideal readers
with the ideal insomnia
> - can do with mere 1s and 0s by stringing enough of
them together.
>
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list