A way to Group Read Mason & Dixon, so to speak.
Mark Kohut
mark.kohut at gmail.com
Mon Dec 22 19:14:08 CST 2014
I, too, take notes elsewhere in my older age. Some marked books from my youth mark me. recently I opened some old marked books from my youth. Remembered some marked , underlined perceptions BUT NOT THE BOOK! Trees, forest problem.
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 22, 2014, at 6:51 PM, msacha1121 at gmail.com wrote:
>
> Good citations both and points well taken. One high school era Nietzsche paperback has me scarred. These days the notes go in a book all their own.
>
> Hope the group read goes well, will try to contribute, work and life permitting.
>
>> On Dec 22, 2014, at 5:06 PM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> And there is having a drink with your old self, the slow learner.....
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Different notes (or none) for different foax. As so often cited, "A former
>>> self is a fool, an insufferable ass, but he's still human, you'd no more
>>> turn him out than you'd turn out any other kind of cripple, would you?"
>>> (Enzian, GR 662)
>>>
>>> For those who care, the 1997-98 P-list group read of M&D is in the WASTE
>>> archive -- poor clunky threading and all -- beginning at
>>>
>>> http://waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l&month=9706&msg=15879&sort=date
>>>
>>> And of course the Pynchon Wiki is full of line-by-line clarification of
>>> specific details and pictures of astrolabes and frizzen flints:
>>>
>>> http://masondixon.pynchonwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
>>>
>>> Neither link is intended to suggest that this reading shouldn't cover the
>>> same ground, wrestle with the same points, etc., or that it should be
>>> annotated, footnoted and scholarly -- only that there are times when a link
>>> can both be quicker and go deeper than typing.
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:45 PM, <msacha1121 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In my pantheon of peeves, this one is near the top. Far be it from saying
>>>> others shouldn't do it, but I find that it hurts rereads. Tougher to get a
>>>> reappraisal when your old self is scribbled there telling you what to pay
>>>> attention to and what to think
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 22, 2014, at 11:43 AM, Becky Lindroos <bekker2 at icloud.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL! That's what a whole lot of my books look like - from The
>>>>> Annotated Alice through Rembrandt's Eyes and Underworld (all hard cover &
>>>>> $$$$). This obviously includes all of Pynchon's works.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bekah
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Dec 22, 2014, at 8:11 AM, Elisabeth Romberg <eromberg at mac.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll have the pen at the ready
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 17. des. 2014 kl. 00.08 skrev Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2014/dec/03/weapon-for-readers/
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>>>>>
>>>>> -
>>>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>>>> -
>>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?listpynchon-l
>>>
>>>
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list