Anyone here read Under the Skin?

[Emma Wrigley]

I really enjoyed the book and look forward to the film, though must add
the film trailer hardly resembles the book. Lynchian I'd say, rather
than Kubrick.
<-----Original Message-----> 
>From: Mark Thibodeau [jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com]
>Sent: 14/2/2014 7:31:18 AM
>To: antizoyd at yahoo.com
>Cc: pynchon-l at waste.org
>Subject: Re: Anyone here read Under the Skin?
>
>Judging from Glazer's two previous films, if we're going by 
>BIRTH, I'd
>say Kubrick. If we're going by SEXY BEAST, I'd say... Madonna's
>ex-hubby. What's's'name. Lock Stock bro.
>
>BIRTH is stylistically like Kubrick, and I am an obsessive - 
>perhaps
>overly so - fan of Kubrick's, so finding 'the next Kubrick' is 
>a bit
>of a hobby of mine. Toddy Hayne's SAFE is the closest 
>approximation to
>a genuinely Kubrickean style without merely aping his tricks 
>that I've
>seen.
>
>YOPJ
>
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Rich Clavey 
> wrote:
>> New Kubrick? New Lynch? I dunno. The trailer sure makes me 
>want to see it
>> though.
>> zoyd
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Mark Thibodeau 
>> To: pynchon -l 
>> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:17 PM
>> Subject: Anyone here read Under the Skin?
>>
>> Apparently, the book is even creepier than this trailer for 
>the movie,
>> which is being hyped as "the new Kubrick".
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXXtTK1dyrg
>> -
>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>>
>>
>-
>Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>.
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20140214/a58b1a5d/attachment.html>