Yet another take on True Detective

[Indel Icate]

You're a beautiful man, with great insights.  I believe you, and agree with
you, to an exstent.

Let me go figure, further, and say some thing that is the wildest thing.
 And I won't try to be literarry.

We made our worlds. At least I did. And we are the same people. Literally,
the same units of consciousness., It's multidimensional.

That's weird, isn't it?

And it's true..I'm not Bled over here, panicking.  Yes I am Bled over here,
panicking.  But I'm right.


On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:52 AM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:

> Nihilism is not the path. It is a quicksand that can make you more lost
> that before.  But when you say, "being and nothingness are the same," you
> are close. But the conclusion that therefore nothing matters is wrong.
> Everything matters very much and deserves our full attention:
>
> November 29, 2012. *115*-minute dharma talk given by Thich Nhat Hanh from
> Lower Hamlet at Plum Village.
>
> http://tnhaudio.org/tag/interbeing/page/2/
>
> Science and Buddhism. Matter and energy. Nothing is born. Nothing dies.
> Our true nature is of no birth and no death. This is the ultimate
> truth. There is no being, no non-being, only Interbeing.
>
> There is a dimension of reality called the historical dimension. In the
> historical dimension we see things as separate - father is outside of the
> son. This is classical science as applied by Newton. But now we have
>  another kind of science that goes deeper; it has discovered a new kind of
> truth. This is represented by quantum physics. It seems to contradict the
> truth found in historical dimension. In meditation there are also two kinds
> of truth: the conventional truth and the ultimate truth. There is path that
> can lead us from historical to ultimate. It is the best practice of
> meditation because it can connect us with the ultimate truth.The Buddha
> used the notions of historical dimension to lead us to the ultimate. This
> was skillful means to helps us to release notions and concepts. The
> teaching of *co-arising* / inter-arising.
> In the ultimate dimension, we use words like Emptiness. This is the
> equivalent to God. It is the ultimate. It is the absence of notions and
> concepts. The teaching of interbeing - nothing by itself can be alone.
> Helps you to be connected to emptiness.
>
> On Wednesday, February 26, 2014, Indel Icate <
> indelicateexplasions at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What we fail to realize, or maybe we do, perhaps it's both, and something
>> between the etching lit snowflakes arriving to the dust of the earth, and
>> arched eyes burning into the flight of the sanguine swan, waning the
>> moonlight, resting, falling, rising, on the waves.
>>
>> I thank you Mr. Morrison for your words.  You are right on.  It's getting
>> to the point where I do need someone, or a guide.  Not my woman, not my
>> lady.  She's all about it.  She is the sweetest dearheart on planet Earth.
>>
>> I was, throughout my life, beyond rational skeptik.  Was I being
>> reasonable?  I decided that being and nothingness were, are, the same.  I'm
>> what you would call, I became, a pure nihilist.
>>
>> What I began to notice, notify, is that what this gauged violet lunacy
>> that is existence on Earth, is ironic.  This world is based, 01010101, on
>> irony.  This life is Irony.  I have traveled this blue, cock sucking, and
>> pussy licking, planet, and it's irony.
>>
>> Here it is.  When a supercharged nihilist, it did not matter.  Nothing.
>>  When I awoke, and realized that I am eternal .... It does not matter.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:55 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Many others have experienced those perceptions, and they are quite real,
>> not delusions, but without a practice in spiritual discipline they can lead
>> to psychosis. If you go out there without a hold on to this realm, a way
>> back, you could put yourself in great mental danger. You need a teacher or
>> guide or a discipline.  Be careful.
>>
>> David Morris
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 25, 2014, Indel Icate <
>> indelicateexplasions at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've been tripping out, like hard, in an odd sort of fashion, as of late,
>> when the storm rises out of the twilight mist, and the paradox meets the
>> synchronicity.  Things, assumptionses, are occurring, rapidly, these days,
>> these mindless timeforms, and there is not but a thing, to describe
>> themselves.  How do you say quantum in a literal way, I mean as
>> in...literally. By which I mean, bookish.
>>
>> I think it's quite possible that we are, literally, multidimensional.
>>
>> I think that, that is, what was, is, and what never happened, happened.
>>  I do not believe that what is, happening, is happening.  There is no time.
>>  It does not exist.  Yet I'm speaking of it.
>>
>> As I become, in age, which is absurd, in my early 40s, there is a
>> no-something, that is occurring.  I am developing this notion, that there
>> is something manifesting on this planet that has not, logickly, to do, with
>> reason.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Antonin Scriabin <
>> kierkegaurdian at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Two of my female friends who watch TD think Woody is gorgeous, and of
>> course Matt spent the better part of his career playing dumb eye candy in
>> rom-coms. So I don't think it's true that ALL the men are ugly, and ALL the
>> women are hot and sexualized. Also see the not super hot, not sexualized,
>> chief of surgery woman Cohle is set up with.
>>  On Feb 25, 2014 12:29 PM, <kelber at mindspring.com> wrote:
>>
>> Look, I really like the show, but I, too, cringed when yet another nubile
>> young woman - she's a clerk at a phone store, not a prostitute - begs
>> overweight, older, drunk, married and, frankly, ugly Woody to fuck her in
>> the ass. And this young woman, with her history of being an abused child
>> turned child-whore, growing up in the strip mall/pork-rind-eating white
>> trash culture, has an absolutely flawless face and body. I guess if she had
>> a little flab on her belly, Woody wouldn't dream of fucking her in any
>> orifice at all. Even Pynchon referenced in V the sad freshman adage that
>> "the ugly ones fuck." Where are the ugly (read: real) women?  Maybe my
>> complaint is with the casting director: aside from the younger black
>> detective (who's merely averagely attractive), and Matt (who cleans up well
>> in the younger scenes, but isn't what you'd call stunning, given the
>> character's weird personality) every man on the show is ugly. The redneck
>> men don't have flawless faces and bodies - no, that wouldn't be realistic,
>> would it? They're overweight, scarred, tattooed, pierced and butt-ugly.
>> Poor Michelle W. - after years of a bad marriage to Woody, she doesn't even
>> earn the right to a double chin or a little flab? Presumably, if she'd "let
>> herself go," we'd see Woody's fucking around as justified. Oh, and where
>> are the black women? Two black male detectives, and a token black male
>> preacher in the first episode - who's in his congregation? Not sexy enough
>> to be hookers or bimbos for Woody?
>>
>> You mention Sherlock, Monte. Again,two main white male characters - but
>> lots of eye candy for women. The show's launched practically a mass
>> movement in China:
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20140226/04ca0cb0/attachment.html>