in Which V. is mentioned. as original.

Mark Kohut mark.kohut at gmail.com
Thu Dec 3 08:48:00 CST 2015


but no matter what one thinks of some of the later books,
Gravity's Rainbow HAS TO BE SEEN as, among much newness,
V. perfected, no?

Gravity's Rainbow is V. squared.

and, didn't Pynchon avoid Parks' basic criticism by writing
SO MANY DIFFERENT new books....

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:34 AM, rich <richard.romeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> w/r/t to Pynchon I think there's some merit to that criticism
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> self-derivative, repetitive,
>> in some way inferior to the first bursts of the writer's vision.
>>
>
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list