in Which V. is mentioned. as original.

[rich]

w/r/t to Pynchon I think there's some merit to that criticism

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:

> self-derivative, repetitive,
> in some way inferior to the first bursts of the writer's vision.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20151203/e5aa757d/attachment.html>