Pynchon's Cameo in IV (PIC)

[Dave Monroe]

I had my moments on wondering, at least ( three times, so far), but
flipping back and forth between tha image and pictures of pynchon, well,
the eyes, maybe, the nose and chin COULD be makeup, but ... but the ears (
and see Carlo Ginzburg on tge importance of those, in both art history and
crminology), and, I'm guessing, the teeth ... again, makeup, but ...

.... but too obvious, too visible, too "grabbable" or whatever (where did
that image come from?),again, watch that window, Pynchon disguised as
himself in 1970, I will of course admit defeat if/ when proven wrong, but
....

On Wednesday, January 14, 2015, Lemuel Underwing <luunderwing at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Oh it's him, I have no doubt, frankly. He's never been so concerned about
visibility, he just hates talking to the press and having his private life
pried into. Putting him in the Burke Stodger movie is absolutely perfect. I
can't imagine him wanting to appear anywhere else in the flick.
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> That was one of my three guesses.  One was proven wrong.  I'm not so
>> sure about this one.  Too visible.  Again, SPOILER ALERT watch the
>> window behind Coy + Doc in the rented house ....
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 9:53 PM, Lemuel Underwing <luunderwing at gmail.com>
wrote:
>> > Sorry, Pynchon, if this causes some subsensory Slight, some aetherial
>> > hiccup.
>> > But hey he like did it for us. Groovy. I loved the movie too, thought
it was
>> > perfect, captured Pynchon's use of Allegory real well.
>> >
>> >
>> > Here he is
>> >
>> >
>> > http://i.imgur.com/m7XFjvE.png?1
>> >
>> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20150114/7c57e4f6/attachment.html>