Re: Maybe Thomas Pynchon wasn’t in Inherent Vice after all

[Dave Monroe]

Two words: make-up (+ he looks oder there than he does out the
window).  But @ least I was glad to know the final paragraph of the
book MIGHT have been used, @ least.  Most, if not all, of the deleted
material does show up in the screenplay, @ least (inc. T. Jefferson +
G. Fang).

http://pdl.warnerbros.com/wbmovies/awards2014/pdf/iv.pdf


On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:09 AM, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com> wrote:
> That suspect looks too young to me in this clip...
>
> The last one is great, though. A more succinctly Pynchonian piece of
> video I have yet to see.
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Same guy who passes by, twice, + stops, significantly, in the window
>> behind Coy + Doc there.  My likely suspect as well.
>>
>> Ca. 0:47 secs in --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=54&v=cHl6qQ3V1Mc
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Lemuel Underwing <luunderwing at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> He certainly was-- the Boards' house, in heavy makeup (wig?) and big grey
>>> mustache. He can be seen especially in the deleted scene feat. Denis and Doc
>>> walking through the party with a different VO
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.avclub.com/article/maybe-thomas-pynchon-wasnt-inherent-vice-after-all-220352
>>>> -
>>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>>>
>>>
>> -
>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l