Re: Maybe Thomas Pynchon wasn’t in Inherent Vice after all

[John Bailey]

Yeah, that bit in the clip that quoted the book's real ending had me wishin'.

On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com> wrote:
> Two words: make-up (+ he looks oder there than he does out the
> window).  But @ least I was glad to know the final paragraph of the
> book MIGHT have been used, @ least.  Most, if not all, of the deleted
> material does show up in the screenplay, @ least (inc. T. Jefferson +
> G. Fang).
>
> http://pdl.warnerbros.com/wbmovies/awards2014/pdf/iv.pdf
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:09 AM, John Bailey <sundayjb at gmail.com> wrote:
>> That suspect looks too young to me in this clip...
>>
>> The last one is great, though. A more succinctly Pynchonian piece of
>> video I have yet to see.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Same guy who passes by, twice, + stops, significantly, in the window
>>> behind Coy + Doc there.  My likely suspect as well.
>>>
>>> Ca. 0:47 secs in --> https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=54&v=cHl6qQ3V1Mc
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Lemuel Underwing <luunderwing at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> He certainly was-- the Boards' house, in heavy makeup (wig?) and big grey
>>>> mustache. He can be seen especially in the deleted scene feat. Denis and Doc
>>>> walking through the party with a different VO
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.avclub.com/article/maybe-thomas-pynchon-wasnt-inherent-vice-after-all-220352
>>>>> -
>>>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -
>>> Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l