NP: RIP William Gass

[Jochen Stremmel]

"Why should you love every woman that walks by?"

Why not, theoretically speaking?

2017-12-07 16:16 GMT+01:00 Atticus Pinecone <atticuspinecone at gmail.com>:

> RIP
>
> On Dec 7, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Smoke Teff <smoketeff at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://bigother.com/2012/07/30/the-gass-sentences-a-top-
> 50-by-stephen-schenkenberg/
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Smoke Teff <smoketeff at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Gerke: Any thoughts on Sebald?
>>
>> Gass: Didn’t read him. I read about 10 pages. That wasn’t just to him.
>> But I could see the rush of this wave of popularity that is almost a death
>> now. So I’m going to have to go back sometime when it’s calmed down and
>> see, because sometimes they’re actually very good. And I’m very arrogant
>> about my judgment. I don’t make mistakes.
>>
>> Gerke: Is that the case with David Foster Wallace too?
>>
>> Gass: He had great abilities. And I think he needed to tame them. I
>> think he was so good that he should’ve wanted to be better. And he wrote
>> some things that are going to stay around. And I wish he had stayed around
>> and done that. He had lots of smarts too. He was unlike a lot of writers
>> who are sort of dumb, theoretically speaking. Stanley was street-smart but
>> intellectually? Awful. But he didn’t need to be. Pynchon’s a case. I have
>> tried to read Pynchon with no success so far, but then I can’t read
>> Whitman—I try. So we just have blank spots. We can’t like everything, and I
>> don’t see any rule for it. Why should you love every woman that walks by?
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20171207/960a0b09/attachment.html>