Katje's peer

[ish mailian]

GR is too deconstructive for the usual Western rationality. Not sure I
understand this, but the novel certainly is "deconstructive" in that
it questions traditional assumptions about certainty, identity, and
truth. And because it is so deconstructive it makes for difficult
reading, often undermines reason, traditional expectations of Western,
'rational" reading.

If I'm reading Bruno right here, the archives of the WASTE for GR are
support for his assertion.
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l