NYT & Russia

[Thomas Eckhardt]

Bravo. Thanks a lot.

Especially for this:

> Rather than leftists being 'class-only,' I see liberals
>as being
> 'class-never,' so to speak. They maybe want more
>identities represented in
> the upper echelons of society, but they don't want any
>fundamental change
> in how society is structured and how systems function.
>The banks should be
> a little nicer with their public image, people of
>different sexualities and
> races should be able to be at the top making life
>miserable and unlivable
> for the multitudes suffering at the bottom...that's
>liberalism. So Chuck
> Shumer, Hillary Clinton, wealthy elites of all flavors
>all perfectly
> represent liberalism to me. And as someone on the left,
>they're no friends
> of mine.

I was not familiar with the term "brocialist":

http://sjwiki.org/wiki/Brocialism
-
Pynchon-l / http://www.waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l