NP - Chemical Weapons Used in Syria... (or WERE they?)

[David Morris]

You have become even more tedious.

David Morris

On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 2:35 PM Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:

> Assessments have been wrong or lies before as in Libya and Iraq.. I did
> provide dissenting voices and their reasons, as  has Thomas many times
> while Morris relies on the dubious authority of the belligerent US  with
> its long history of calls for regime change, and its compliant friends.
> While it seems highly dubious that Assad would make such a stupid move for
> such trivial military benefit, I am happy to concede that proof of this
> coud be persuasively set forth with neutral investigators. So far that has
> not happened and the much biggr problem is the international response.
> After all the UN mechanism for response to such an action is not a military
> assault by the US.
>
>  While many Syrians legitimately hate Assad as an authoritarian bully,
> there have never been any organized moderate rebels with military power.(
> That according to our own military assessments) The various groups seizing
> territory in Syria have been murderous extremists and the US and Saudis
> have funded and armed them. As their rebellion is in the final stages of
> failure it is not the least unlikely that they did a chemical weapons
> attack to blame Assad, bring in the US and prolong the fight. Seymour
> Hersch made a strong case that this was the nature of the first chemical
> weapons incident.
>
> War crimes in this region have been going on for decades with the US a
> chief violator. Why are you so eager to see more war? What good have these
> wars done?  It just looks like a hangover from extreme Hillary support,
> like anger channeled toward hate and violence.
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>