NP - The NATION (magazine), SYRIA, AND THE TRUTH ABOUT CHEMICAL WEAPONS

[David Morris]

I'm not his monkey.  If he wants to ignore the substance of my post, and
then ramble on, I can point that out w/o addressing his ramble.

David Morris

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:57 PM Jochen Stremmel <jstremmel at gmail.com>
wrote:

> He asked some serious questions that you ignored.
>
> 2018-04-27 19:45 GMT+02:00 David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>:
>
> > As usual, you have ignored the supject of the article I posted (The
> Nation
> > magazine lied to cast doubt on Assad's chew attack), and then just
> > ramble-rant on about whatever you feel like.  You don't know how to
> > converse.
> >
> > David Morris
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:07 AM Joseph Tracy <brook7 at sover.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Virtually every branch of federal power is now headed by people whose
> > > primary qualification is kissing the ass of a man who lies daily. The
> US
> > > government and press have a history of lies and misinformation
> > particularly
> > > to justify military actions. What I see are many assurances from big
> > shots
> > > and all the evidence coming from White Helmet types who are part of
> > > opposition to Assad. I have seen no substantive evidence, and you do
> not
> > > list any, but what major difference does it make? The US wars to topple
> > > regimes have done far more evil than good and have not brought
> stability
> > or
> > > just government. The US has committed many war crimes itself, the wars
> > only
> > > serve to bankrupt our own democracy and give ever more power to the
> > weapons
> > > industry and military.  Why are you promoting this agenda?  Why not
> > choose
> > > the arrests and killings in Egypt, Gaza, Burma, Turkey, Honduras etc.
> > Why
> > > so obsessed with this neocon agenda?
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Apr 26, 2018, at 4:34 PM, David Morris <fqmorris at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On April 11th 2017, the US National Security Council released a
> 4-page
> > > > reportwhich stated, “The United States is confident that the Syrian
> > > regime
> > > > conducted a chemical weapons attack, using the nerve agent sarin,
> > against
> > > > its own people in the town of Khan Shaykhun in southern Idlib Proince
> > on
> > > > April 4, 2017.”  The same day, Secretary of Defense James Mattis
> > > declared,
> > > > “Last Tuesday on the 4th of April, the Syrian regime attacked its own
> > > > people using chemical weapons. I have personally reviewed the
> > > intelligence,
> > > > and there is no doubt the Syrian regime is responsible for the
> decision
> > > to
> > > > attack and for the attack itself.”
> > > >
> > > > Imagine if, after all that, Secretary Mattis stated that “we do not
> > have
> > > > evidence” that the Assad regime was responsible for the Khan Shaykhun
> > > > attack.  It would be a shocking admission, staggering in its
> > > implications.
> > > > But Mattis never made such an admission.
> > > >
> > > > Nevertheless, *The Nation* published an article on April 16th 2018
> > > claiming
> > > > that he did.  Its claim is indisputably false.  [...]   *The Nation*
> is
> > > > deceiving the public on a matter of the utmost gravity.
> > > >
> > > > The transcript of the February press conference is available for all
> to
> > > > read.
> > > >
> > > > It matters what happened in Khan Shaykhun.  We have abundant
> evidence,
> > > > certified by the UN, that the Assad regime launched a gas attack
> > causing
> > > > dozens of men, women, and children to suffer agonizing deaths. The
> > > Nation’s
> > > > claim encourages readers to think otherwise, but the claim is a
> > > > fabrication.  Stephen Shalom (the author of a superb Jacobin article
> on
> > > the
> > > > Khan Shaykhun attack) has made the following observation about those
> > who
> > > > propagate the James Mattis "no evidence" assertion: “Sometimes, a
> claim
> > > is
> > > > so clearly without merit, so obviously ludicrous, that those who
> > promote
> > > it
> > > > mark themselves, at best, as individuals wholly uninterested in
> > examining
> > > > evidence when a dubious claim conforms to their preconceived notions,
> > or,
> > > > at worst, as scoundrels.”  The journalistic malpractice of The Nation
> > > > insults victims and harms the truth.
> > > > --
> > > > Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
> > >
> > > --
> > > Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
> > >
> > --
> > Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
> >
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>