Even NASA knows. Or Esp NASA knows.

[Mark Kohut]

Monte,

Somehow, fully sea-changed, not in any match-up correspondence way, don't
you think Tom had all that circular
design architecture from Dante's Comedia swirling around inside so he could
keep thinking conically, so to speak?
Possibly, unproveably but in much likelihood?

Mark

On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Monte Davis <montedavis49 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes. Every time through GR, I find more variant riffs on the conic
> sections (point, line, circle, ellipse, parabola, hyperbola) and a thousand
> kinds of literal and metaphoric "movement." More often than not, cyclic
> progressions -- the circle that the rainbow would be if it were not cut off
> by the horizon, Saturn's ever-so-slightly-elliptical rings -- are good.
>
> Interrupted ones -- the parabolic rocket trajectory which yearns to be an
> orbit or escape, but runs into a target first -- not so much.
>
> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 3:29 AM, Mark Kohut <mark.kohut at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/jpl/pia22418/gravity-s-rainbow
>> --
>> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>>
>
>