Russian Collusion

[Roger Mexico]

Any way of viewing this review for free?

On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 10:12 PM jody2.718 <jody2.718 at protonmail.com> wrote:

> Well, David, Hersh used to have some credibility back when The Paper of
> Record was fronting Judith Miller, and the Pakistani Inter-Services
> Intelligence Directorate (ISI) was helping Bin Laden, et. al., escape from
> Afghanistan-  much water under the dam since then. And frankly, I don't
> think that if Trump, himself, signed on to the P-list and began proclaiming
> that the Russian investigation was a CIA con job, it would influence the
> Mueller Investigation too much, do you?
>
> I'm much more interested in discussing Bleeding Edge- an amazing
> achievement in American Letters. It's been seventeen years since 9/11, the
> time it took Joyce to complete Finnegan's Wake, and the effects are still
> rippling out from that momentous calamity. It may not have been The Fall,
> but it was the fall of the virtual American Hegemony in place since
> Hiroshima. You might also find that the very topics you're so concerned
> about, as Mr. Kohut has repeatedly implied, are foreshadowed in Bleeding
> Edge.
>
> I was able to get my hands on Michael Chabon's wonderful review of
> Bleeding Edge in the NY Review ([November 7, 2013 Issue](
> https://www.nybooks.com/issues/2013/11/07/)) today, and it confirms my
> belief that Bleeding Edge deserves more discussion (and praise) then it's
> gotten, especially here.
>
> jody
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> "Who gives a fuck about what "Hersh says"?  Or why should we?  Our lying
> eyes need more anti-eye-lies? We could spiral this dizzyness into complete
> inaction, couldn't we?"
>
> David Morris
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>