Isis funded by UK & US

David Morris fqmorris at gmail.com
Sun May 19 22:51:38 CDT 2019


I think I was in college when I was taught that Left versus Right was
actually a circle. I am only now seeing how that works.  I wish I hadn't.

Thanks Jerky,

David Morris

On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 10:43 PM Mark Thibodeau <jerkyleboeuf at gmail.com>
wrote:

> How incredibly blinkered do you have to be to come away from recent
> news about the OPCW's report (which says pretty much the exact
> opposite, in general, of that which is reported at SPUTNIK, RT and (I
> hate to say this) Consortium News?
>
> I urge folks to check Google News for a variety of different news
> sources, from a variety of different perspectives, to see what's
> REALLY going on re: Syria's (now all but 100% confirmed) chlorine gas
> chemical attack on its own citizens in Douma, and to see for
> yourselves how twisted the New Fascist International Kremlin
> propaganda machine has had to have its various vassal organs twist
> themselves to save even a tiny amount of face in the aftermath of the
> preliminary report's release.
>
> Jerky
>
> <
> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> Virus-free. www.avg.com
> <
> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
> >
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 10:14 AM Thomas Eckhardt
> <thomas.eckhardt at uni-bonn.de> wrote:
> >
> > On April 7, 2018, allegedly a chemical weapons attack took place in the
> > Syrian city of Douma. France, the UK and the US (as well as Germany)
> > claimed that the Syrian government was responsible and on April 14 the
> > "retaliated" with a missile strike on Syria. Russia had warned against
> > this strike at the UN and threatened that if Russian servicemen were
> > targeted, Russia would not only destroy the missiles but also the
> > vessels from which they were fired. Thankfully, no Russians were harmed.
> >
> > The OPCW published an interim report on the incident in July 2018, and
> > its final report in March 2019.
> >
> > OPCW staff members have now leaked a report on an investigation that was
> > undertaken by an engineering sub-team of the Fact-Finding Mission,
> > "beginning with on-site inspections in April-May 2018, followed by a
> > detailed engineering analysis including collaboration on computer
> > modelling studies with two European universities. The report of this
> > investigation was excluded from the published Final Report of the
> > Fact-Finding Mission, which referred only to assessments sought from
> > unidentified 'engineering experts' commissioned in October 2018 and
> > obtained in December 2018."
> >
> >
> http://syriapropagandamedia.org/working-papers/assessment-by-the-engineering-sub-team-of-the-opcw-fact-finding-mission-investigating-the-alleged-chemical-attack-in-douma-in-april-2018
> >
> > (It was the first time that OPCW inspectors were able to conduct an
> > investigation of an alleged CW incident on site; with regard to the
> > incident in Khan Sheikoun, the OPCW had already been critizised for
> > violating its own guidelines by failing to establish chain of custody.)
> >
> > The investigation of the engineering sub-team related to the two gas
> > cylinders observed at the site. The report may be found here:
> >
> >
> http://syriapropagandamedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Engineering-assessment-of-two-cylinders-observed-at-the-Douma-incident-27-February-2019-1.pdf
> >
> > The OPCW has confirmed that the report is genuine.
> >
> > The engineering report states:
> >
> > "The dimensions, characteristics and appearance of the cylinders, and
> > the surrounding scene of the incidents, were inconsistent with what
> > would have been expected in the case of either cylinder being delivered
> > from an aircraft. In each case the alternative hypothesis produced the
> > only plausible explanation for observations at the scene."
> >
> > The Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media comments:
> >
> > "The conclusion of the Engineering Assessment is unequivocal: the
> > alternative hypothesis  that the cylinders were manually placed in
> > position is 'the only plausible explanation for observations at the
> scene'."
> >
> > And puts the leaked document in context:
> >
> > "Our last Briefing Note listed two other key findings:
> >
> > It is no longer seriously disputed that the hospital scene was staged:
> > there are multiple eyewitness reports supported by video evidence.
> > The case fatality rate of 100%, with no attempt by the victims to
> > escape, is unlike any recorded chlorine attack.
> >
> > Taken together, these findings establish beyond reasonable doubt that
> > the alleged chemical attack in Douma on 7 April 2018 was staged."
> >
> > It seems that the OPCW has suppressed the findings of their own
> > Fact-Finding Mission because these findings would have contradicted its
> > public conclusions and undermined the narrative propagated by the
> > Governments of the United States, United Kingdom and France, as well as
> > the entirety of the Western mainstream media.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 17.05.2019 18:38, schrieb Joseph Tracy:
> > > This is an opinion piece in the Guardian but entirely based on
> documentary evidence and ongoing legal actions in the so called war on
> terror.
> > >
> > >
> https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/03/us-isis-syria-iraq?fbclid=IwAR26fC470VexPo17OiCnr0I13Oaq2uV5H7SVVnUeaI054LiC3QIu3Vf5ZDI
> > > --
> > > Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
> --
> Pynchon-L: https://waste.org/mailman/listinfo/pynchon-l
>


More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list